Home Blog Page 55

Selenium Prevents Many Diseases Caused By Poor Nutrition

Selenium is a trace mineral found naturally in soil that also is found in certain foods and in small amounts in water. Selenium prevents many diseases so is vital for the body as it helps with immunity, has antioxidant activity and plays a major role in a healthy metabolism. Consuming plenty of naturally occurring selenium prevents disease, has antiviral effects, is essential for male and female fertility and reduces the risk of cancer, autoimmune and thyroid diseases.
Lancet, 2012 Mar 31;379 (9822):1256-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61452-9. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
How Selenium Benefits Your Body

Health Benefits of SeleniumSelenium prevents many diseases because it increases antioxidant capabilities and the quality of blood flow, therefore enhancing the body’s resistance against disease and stress. Selenium’s role in antioxidant activity lowers free radical damage and reduces inflammation. Selenium also helps prevent common types of cancer, fight off viruses, defend against heart disease, and slow down symptoms of several other serious conditions like asthma.

Whole foods are the best sources of selenium, especially when these foods are handled and prepared in a delicate way, since selenium can be destroyed during processing and high heat cooking. Natural foods that are high in selenium include Brazil nuts, eggs, liver, tuna, cod, and sunflower seeds, in addition to poultry and certain types of meat.

Selenium deficiency is uncommon in the U.S. However, conditions like HIV, Crohn’s disease and disorders that impair nutrient absorption are associated with low selenium levels. Selenium deficiency is also linked to Aids and Ebola. An organic, raw food diet is rich in selenium, especially Brazil nuts — one of the best sources in the world!

Selenium has a key role to the immune system for the activity of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase and for preventing blood coagulation. A severe deficiency of selenium causes blood coagulation leading to hemorrhaging, seen in animals infected with hemorrhagic viruses. — Bausch DG, Towner JS, Dowell SF, Kaducu F, Lukwiya M, Sanchez A, et al. Assessment of the Risk of Ebola Virus Transmission from Bodily Fluids and Fomites. J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 15;196(s2):S142“S147. Available from: http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/cont…/…/Supplement_2/S142.full

Many lessons can be learned from the HIV virus since both of these viruses mutate quickly since there isn’t as much error-checking with RNA as there is with DNA. Both viruses thrive in West Africa in areas known to have selenium-deficient soil. Both make selenoproteins, which contain selenium bound as selenocysteine. When the infected person has a high selenium status, as well as a high antioxidant state, viral replication is slowed. But when selenium is low or deficient the virus multiplies causing more mutations. Experiments with animals have shown that fairly benign viruses can mutate into much more virulent viruses when a host is selenium-deficient. — Taylor EW, Ramanathan CS. Theoretical Evidence that the Ebola Virus Zaire Strain May Be Selenium-Dependent: A Factor in Pathogenesis and Viral Outbreaks? J Orthomol Med. 1995;10(2):131“8. Available from: http://orthomolecular.org/…/articl…/1995-v10n0304-p131.shtml[/note]

For HIV, better selenium status lead to fewer hospitalizations and lower mortality. [note]Baum MK, Shor-Posner G, Lai S, Zhang G, Lai H, Fletcher MA, et al. High risk of HIV-related mortality is associated with selenium deficiency. —J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirology Off Publ Int Retrovirology Assoc. 1997 Aug 15;15(5):370“4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9342257

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial showed that selenium protected HIV patients from an increased viral load and increased the number of CD4+ T cells. —Hurwitz BE, Klaus JR, Llabre MM, Gonzalez A, Lawrence PJ, Maher KJ, et al. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral load with selenium supplementation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 22;167(2):148“54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17242315

A follow-up study found that a combination of B vitamins, vitamin C, and selenium cut the risk in half of HIV-positive patients in Botswana from a critically low CD4+ T cell count, or from progression of the disease. — Baum MK, Campa A, Lai S, Sales Martinez S, Tsalaile L, Burns P, et al. Effect of micronutrient supplementation on disease progression in asymptomatic, antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults in Botswana: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2154“63. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24281460

Today, low selenium status is accepted as a risk factor for HIV.

Selenium was used during an outbreak of hemorrhagic fever in China to treat fast progressing and severe cases. Mortality decreased from 100% in the untreated group to 36% in the treated group for the fulminant cases and from 22% in the untreated severe cases to 0% in the selenium-treated severe cases. — Hou JC, Jiang ZY, He ZF. [Inhibitory effect of selenium on complement activation and its clinical significance]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1993 Nov;73(11):645“6, 699. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7907268

So, selenium has already been successfully used to prevent depletion of selenium in response to hemorrhagic fever. Doctors noted, of course, that it is better to begin supplementation before the immune system is compromised.

For the last 25 years the average daily selenium intake has fallen from something like 60µg/day to less than 35µg/day in some areas. Selenium content of food is largely dependent on location and soil conditions, which vary widely. The average daily intake in the U.S. is 125 mcg per day. Populations of the Eastern Coastal Plain and the Pacific Northwest have the lowest selenium levels, averaging between 60 to 90 mcg per day, which is still considered to be adequate intake.

Recommended Dietary Allowance

  • Children 1-3 20 mcg/day
  • Children 4-8 30 mcg/day
  • Children 9-13 40 mcg/day
  • Adults (over 14 ) 55 mcg/day
  • Pregnant women 60 mcg/day
  • Breastfeeding women 70 mcg/day

This Includes the total amount of selenium you get from foods and supplements. In studies on selenium for prostate cancer prevention, men took 200 mcg daily. The safe limit is 400 mcg a day in adults. Anything above that is considered an overdose.

Natural vegan food sources of selenium include:
  • Brazil Nuts
  • Sunflower Seeds
  • Mushrooms (button, crimini, shiitake)
  • Grains (wheat germ, barley, brown rice, oats)
  • Onions

Whole foods are the best sources of selenium. The mineral may be destroyed during processing. Taken at normal doses, selenium does not usually have side effects. An overdose may cause bad breath, fever, nausea, and liver, kidney and heart problems. Selenium may also interact with other medicines and supplements, such as antacids, chemotherapy drugs, corticosteroids, niacin, cholesterol-lowering statin drugs, and birth control pills. People at high risk of skin cancer should not take selenium supplements. People at risk for type 2 diabetes who took 200 mcg a day of selenium were 50% more likely to develop type diabetes so should discuss the risk with a doctor.

— Passwater R. Selenium Against Viruses: More Exciting Research from Dr. Will Taylor [Internet]. Available from: http://www.drpasswater.com/nutrition_library/selenium1.html

— McPherson, A. et al. NRC Research Press 1997: 203-205

(C) 2013-2017 Robert Ross, RawFoodLife.com, LLC

Also Read:

Clinically Proven CBD Oil — A 10,000 Year Old “Medical Breakthrough”

Whole food for Healing, Abundant Energy & Empowerment

I’m sure many of us desire to live a natural and whole life, free from disease — yet feel frustrated with what we come face-to-face with on a daily basis. We face many complexities with all the food choices, addictions, healthcare options, and environmental impacts impacting on our bodies. It can get quite overwhelming and confusing what it comes to the “proper diet,” which can lead us into frustration and despair. But wait a minute… I have fantastic news. You can use delicious, raw whole food for healing!

I have taken the time to break down what it takes to heal naturally. You will not be overwhelmed because I will give you basic step-to-step instructions on how you can effectively accomplish this with or without adhering to a 100% raw food diet!

So, please, if you are truly seeking empowerment in your own health and want to experience healing or simply feel energetic, please watch the YouTube video I have created. It is 27 minutes long, but worth it. Clear out your schedule, kick back, and learn my simple tactics. I assure you will not be disappointed!

The procedure mentioned in the video above is exactly what the health institutes and many nutritionists do in order to help heal people from disease. I’ve met countless people who have healed from all sorts of degenerative diseases through using this method. You can take control of your health and experience healing! See Joshua’s testimony on how he has been healed from prostate and colon cancer naturally! This is only one amazing testimony and there have been others.

There is an overwhelming effect of the cause of disease Americans are facing today.

In this video you discovered that the real reason why people are becoming sicker by the day. People are becoming overly dependent upon drugs. People, dare I say, “trust” in doctors because they think it’s the best solution. Now, I’m not against the medical profession. I know that they are necessary when it comes to life threatening situations, but most of the diseases that people face are, in fact, preventable. When people go see doctors, symptoms are treated instead of discovering the cause.

More and more elderly are facing dementia and Alzheimer’s disease at an astonishing rate. As I have indicated in the video, 1 of 3 elderly dies from this disease in the United States and there has been a baffled 68% increase in incidences of Alzheimer’s between the year 2000 and 2010!

It Comes down to One Simple Thing — Eliminate Processed Foods & Use Whole Food for Healing!

This is one of the main reasons why many diets work because they all share one thing in common…simply eliminate processed foods from the diet! In the video above, it is laid out perfectly on what this is and how to do it. Although I have been on a 100% raw food diet for 16 years now and that is my personal lifestyle choice. I’m not here to twist your arm into this lifestyle. You too can heal simply by following a whole food diet with the simple indication of eliminating processed foods, GMOs and refined sugars!

If that’s too much for you to handle, it’s okay! Take baby steps as long as you head towards that direction. And eventually your body will move towards the healing process. Yes, I am saying you can eat chicken, turkey, eggs, dairy, raw foods, and cooked foods and experience healing.

Discover what works for you and will keep you motivated to heal yourself.

Everyone is different. I may be a madman and converted to a 100% raw food diet overnight, but that does not mean you need to do the same. I fully support everyone who desires to adhere to use whole food for healing (both cooked and uncooked). Even more so, I support those who need to take it slowly, yet are heading in the right direction. It is up to you how much and how fast you want to transition yourself into a full healthy lifestyle.

I have compiled a list of whole food for healing that I believe will help you find the road to healing. Take a look at my approved whole food list below and print it out to carry with you, post on your refrigerator, or share with others! In fact, a good example of a delicious approved whole foods that have become the big thing in our store are the bean pastas, which are available in mung beans, adzuki beans, black beans, and soybeans. They are absolutely delicious and 100% organic and whole food approved from my list!

Today may be the beginning of a new journey…

It’s never too late. No matter how sick you feel or how old you are, there is always a new beginning. Today is your chance to take control of your health with these simple tools I have provided. Blessings on your new journey!

Matt’s Whole Food List
Combining Rule: don’t mix animal protein with any starches such as baked potatoes, brown rice or other grains.
  • Quinoa (Steamed or Sprouted)
  • Millet (Steamed or Sprouted)
  • Buckwheat (Steamed or Sprouted)
  • Amaranth (Steamed or Sprouted)
  • Quinoa pasta or other whole grain, gluten-free pastas
  • Steamed legumes (lentils, garbanzo beans, etc.)
  • Peas
  • Brown rice Brown rice products (pasta, rice cakes, etc.)
  • Non-GMO corn products
  • Beans
  • Cooked whole potatoes
  • Sweet potatoes
  • Yams, squashes, pumpkins
  • Whole grain bread (preferably gluten-free)
  • Egg yolks Egg whites
  • Chicken
  • Fish
  • Turkey
  • Goat’s cheese (preferably raw)
  • Goat’s milk (preferably raw)
  • Goat’s sour cream (preferably raw)
  • Goat’s cottage cheese (preferably raw)
  • Steamed vegetables
  • Fruit
  • Nuts
  • Seeds
  • Dried fruit
  • Vegetables
  • Avocados
  • Olives
  • Flax crackers
  • Natural nut and seed oils
  • Olive oil
  • Coconut oil
  • Apple cider vinegar
  • Seaweeds
  • Sprouts
  • Legumes
  • Fermented foods
  • Preserved vegetables in oil
  • Bee products (honey, pollen, royal jelly, etc.)
  • Dehydrated foods
  • Superfoods (goji berries, maca, acai, etc.)
  • Algaes
  • Raw cacao
  • Salt (e.g. sea salt, Himalayan salt)
  • Whole spices and herbs
By Matthew Monarch, September, 2014

Matt MonarchIn this exclusive guest editorial, Matt Monarch shares what he feels is the most critical part of a healthy diet, whether or not you are choose to live a raw food lifestyle (75% to 100%). Matt  as been at the forefront of the Raw Foods Movement for over 18 years. He has worked with numerous clients, celebrities, nutritionists and doctors and has studied all of the alternative diets on the market today. He travels worldwide teaching about healthy eating and healing from degenerative diseases. Matt shares many different methods to help people heal, whether they want to follow a strict 100% Raw Food Diet or choose a simple cooked Whole Foods Diet. He runs one of the leading raw food websites, The Raw Food World.

Also Read:

Avocado … a Raw Food Staple!

What Mainstream Media Isn’t Telling You About GMO Foods!

You need Non-GMO & Organic Foods to be truly healthy.

What you don’t know about GMO foods is just part of a much larger problem – one of particular importance to raw foodists! GMOs are probably the biggest threat to your health (and the health of our planet) in modern history. Personally, I think it is a bigger, more immediate threat than even Global Warming or Fukushima! To be successful and healthy as a raw foodist we MUST have access to healthy non-GMO and organic foods.

You see, the #1 enemy of organic foods are GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms). Even conventional non-GMO foods are a huge improvement over GMOs!  GMOs not only threaten to put organic farmers out of business, they actually do that every day when they contaminate organic and conventional crops with genetic drift – GMOs that float through the air contaminating nearby fields. iStock_000003556658Xcrop

GMO Frankenfood companies like Monsanto actually have sued the poor farmers they just ruined for growing their patented crops — and often win! They try to control the courts with a combination of deep pockets, armies of lawyers and who knows what else, though lately farmers are starting to get the upper hand with these ludicrous cases!

Study the facts for yourself, learn the truth and be empowered in your own healthy choices. One great resource is the book, Genetic Roulette by Jeffrey M. Smith, provides a more detailed analysis of the documented health risks of GMOs. If you like his book Seeds of Deception, you’ll be blown away by this one. Smith gives you the ammunition you need to shatter the biotech industry’s claim that genetically modified (GMO) foods are safe. When you read the sample that follows, it becomes blindingly clear that the so-called “science” of genetics is more dangerous than anyone thought:

  • Evaluation of gene insertion sites have shown relocations of up to 40,000 DNA base pairs, mixing together of foreign and host DNA, large scale deletions of more than a dozen genes and multiple random insertions of foreign DNA fragments.
  • During insertion, the foreign gene may become truncated, rearranged or interspersed with extraneous pieces of DNA. The proteins produced by the distorted foreign gene may be misfolded or have added molecules, so they may operate differently and be harmful in unpredictable ways.
  • One study using a micro-array gene chip found that 5% of the host’s genes changed their levels of expression after a single gene was inserted.
  • The promoter used in nearly all GM crops permanently turns on the foreign gene at high output. Scientists had thought the promoter would only turn on the foreign gene, but, in fact, it can accidentally turn on other natural plant genes–permanently–genes that may overproduce an allergen, toxin, carcinogen or anti-nutrient, or regulators that block other genes.
  • When certain viruses infect an organism, they splice themselves into the host’s DNA. If the GM promoter is inserted in the vicinity of a dormant virus, it might switch it on, resulting in virus activation.
  • In GMO Roundup Ready soybeans, the “stop signal” placed at the end of the gene cassette is dysfunctional, so longer than intended RNA proteins are produced, which are further rearranged into four non-intended variants, any one of which might be harmful.
  • DNA changes in GM plants can alter the amounts of the chemicals the plant naturally produces, increasing its output of toxins or decreasing the amount of protective phytonutrients produced. For example, GM soybeans produce less cancer-fighting isoflavones.
  • GM proteins in soybeans, corn and papaya are similar to known allergens and may cause allergies.
  • Transgenes survive digestion and can transfer to gut bacteria or move into the blood and organs, including passing through the placenta into the fetus and through the blood-brain barrier. The only human feeding trial ever published confirmed that genetic material from Roundup Ready soybeans transferred into the gut bacteria in three of seven human volunteers. Once in the human gut bacteria, the transferred portion of the transgene produced herbicide-resistant protein. If the antibiotic-resistant genes that have been inserted into most GM foods on the market were to transfer to pathogenic bacteria in the gut, antibiotic-resistant diseases could develop. If the transgene for the Bt pesticide were to transfer to our gut bacteria, we could become living pesticide factories.

Scary stuff! The research actually shows what happens when animals and people consume GMO foods is not reassuring – and is not covered in major media at all! Here are just a few more highlights from Jeffrey’s book:

  • Rats fed Monsanto’s Mon 863 Bt corn for 90 days showed significant changes in their blood cells, livers and kidneys.
  • Rats were fed the GM FlavrSavr tomato for 28 days. Seven of 20 rats developed stomach lesions (bleeding stomachs); another 7 of 40 died within two weeks.
  • About 25% of the sheep in herds grazing continuously on Bt cotton plants in India after the cotton harvest died within a week, according to reports from 4 villages. Post mortem studies suggested a toxic reaction.
  • Twelve dairy cows died on a farm in Hesse Germany, after being fed a diet with significant amounts of the GM corn variety, Bt 176. Other cows in the herd developed a mysterious illness and had to be killed. Syngenta, the producers of Bt 176, compensated the farmer for part of his losses, but despite the farmer’s demands and public protests, no detailed autopsy reports were made available.
    More than 20 farmers in North America have reported that pigs fed GM corn had low conception rates, false pregnancies or gave birth to bags of water. Both male and female pigs became sterile.
  • In mice fed GMO soy, production of alpha-amylase, an enzyme responsible for digesting starch, dropped by as much as 77%.
  • In male mice fed Roundup Ready soybeans, the structure and gene expression pattern of testicular cells changed significantly.
  • Female rats were fed Roundup Ready soy starting before conception and continuing through weaning. 55.6% of the offspring died within three weeks compared to 9% of non-GM soy controls. In another study, after a lab began feeding rats a commercial diet containing GM soy, offspring mortality reached 55.3%. When offspring from the GM-fed rats were mated together, they were unable to conceive.
  • In 2003, approximately 100 people living next to a Bt cornfield in the Philippines developed skin, respiratory, intestinal reactions and other symptoms while the corn was shedding pollen. Blood tests of 39 people showed an antibody response to Bt-toxin. Symptoms reappeared in 2004 in at least four other villages that planted the same GM corn variety.
  • GM soy was imported into the UK shortly before 1999. Within a year, soy allergies in the UK had risen from 10% to 15% of the sampled population. Antibody tests show that some individuals react differently to GM and normal soy varieties. GM soy has higher levels of a known allergen.
  • One brand of the supplement L-tryptophan created a deadly epidemic in the U.S. in the 1980s. The company responsible had genetically engineered bacteria to produce the supplement more economically. The resulting product contained many contaminants, five or six of which were suspected as the cause of the disease. Not only the GM L-tryptophan supplement, but all L-tryptophan was removed, and still remains off the market.
And now, here’s that list of what you don’t know about GMO foods!
  1. GMO foods won’t solve the food crisis

A 2008 World Bank report concluded that increased biofuel production is the major cause of the increase in food prices.[1]  GM giant Monsanto has been at the heart of the lobbying for biofuels (crops grown for fuel rather than food) — while profiting enormously from the resulting food crisis and using it as a PR opportunity to promote GM foods!

“The climate crisis was used to boost biofuels, helping to create the food crisis; and now the food crisis is being used to revive the fortunes of the GM industry.” — Daniel Howden, Africa correspondent of The Independent [2]

“The cynic in me thinks that they’re just using the current food crisis and the fuel crisis as a springboard to push GM crops back on to the public agenda. I understand why they’re doing it, but the danger is that if they’re making these claims about GM crops solving the problem of drought or feeding the world, that’s bullshit.” — Prof Denis Murphy, head of biotechnology at the University of Glamorgan in Wales [3]

  1. GMO crops do not increase yield potential

Despite the promises, GM has not increased the yield potential of any commercialised crops.[4] In fact, studies show that the most widely grown GM crop, GM soya, has suffered reduced yields.[5]

“Let’s be clear. As of this year [2008], there are no commercialized GM crops that inherently increase yield. Similarly, there are no GM crops on the market that were engineered to resist drought, reduce fertilizer pollution or save soil. Not one.” — Dr Doug Gurian-Sherman, former biotech specialist for the US Environmental Protection Agency and former advisor on GM to the US Food and Drug Administration [6]

  1. GMO crops increase pesticide use

Official data shows that in the US, GM crops have produced an overall average increase, not decrease, in pesticide use compared to conventional crops.[7]

“The promise was that you could use less chemicals and produce a greater yield. But let me tell you none of this is true.” — Bill Christison, President of the US National Family Farm Coalition [8]

  1. There are better ways to feed the world

A major recent UN/World Bank-sponsored report compiled by 400 scientists, and endorsed by 58 countries, concluded that GM crops have little to offer global agriculture and the challenges of poverty, hunger, and climate change, because better alternatives are available.[9]

  1. Other farm technologies are more successful

Integrated Pest Management and other innovative low-input or organic methods of controlling pests and boosting yields have proven highly effective, particularly in the developing world.[10] Other plant breeding technologies, such as Marker Assisted Selection (non-GM genetic mapping), are widely expected to boost global agricultural productivity more effectively and safely than GM.[11]

“The quiet revolution is happening in gene mapping, helping us understand crops better. That is up and running and could have a far greater impact on agriculture [than GM].” — Prof John Snape, head of the department of crop genetics, John Innes Centre [12]

  1. GMO foods have not been shown to be safe to eat

Genetic modification is a crude and imprecise way of incorporating foreign genetic material (e.g. from viruses, bacteria) into crops, with unpredictable consequences. The resulting GM foods have undergone little rigorous and no long-term safety testing, but animal feeding tests have shown worrying health effects.[13] Only one study has been published on the direct effects on humans of eating a GM food.[14] It found unexpected effects on gut bacteria, but was never followed up.

“We are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences.” — Dr Suzanne Wuerthele, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toxicologist

  1. Stealth GMOs in animal feed — without consumers’ consent

Meat, eggs and dairy products from animals raised on the millions of tons of GM feed imported into Europe do not have to be labelled. Studies have shown that if GM crops are fed to animals, GM material can appear in the resulting products.[15] As GM foods have been shown to affect animals’ health, eating such “stealth GMOs” may affect the health of consumers.

  1. No one is monitoring the impact of GMO foods on health

It is claimed that Americans have eaten GM foods for years with no ill effects. But these foods are unlabeled in the US and no one has monitored the consequences. With other novel foods like trans fats, it has taken decades to realize that they have caused millions of premature deaths.[16]

  1. GMO and non-GMO foods cannot co-exist

GM contamination of conventional and organic food is increasing. An unapproved GM rice that was grown for only one year in field trials was found to have extensively contaminated the US rice supply and seed stocks.[17] In Canada, the organic oilseed rape industry has been destroyed by contamination from GM rape.[18] In Spain, a study found that GM maize “has caused a drastic reduction in organic cultivations of this grain and is making their coexistence practically impossible”.[19]

The time has come to choose between GMO-based or non-GMO-based world food supply.

“If some people are allowed to choose to grow, sell and consume GM foods, soon nobody will be able to choose food, or a biosphere, free of GM. It’s a one way choice, like the introduction of rabbits or cane toads to Australia; once it’s made, it can’t be reversed.” — Roger Levett, specialist in sustainable development [20]

  1. We can’t trust GMO companies

The big biotech firms pushing their GM foods have a terrible history of toxic contamination and public deception.[21] GM is attractive to them because it gives them patents that allow monopoly control over the world’s food supply. They have taken to harassing and intimidating farmers for the “crime” of saving patented seed or “stealing” patented genes — even if those genes got into the farmer’s fields through accidental contamination by wind or insects.[22]

“Farmers are being sued for having GMOs on their property that they did not buy, do not want, will not use and cannot sell.” — Tom Wiley, North Dakota farmer [23]

References
  1. “A Note on Rising Food Prices”, Donald Mitchell, World Bank report, 2008.
    http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Environment/documents/2008/07/10/Biofuels.PDF
  2. “Hope for Africa lies in political reforms”, Daniel Howden, The Independent, 8 September 2008, http://www.independent.co.uk:80/opinion/commentators/daniel-howden-hope-for-africa-lies-in-political-reforms-922487.html
  3. “GM: it’s safe, but it’s not a saviour”, Rob Lyons, Spiked Online, 7 July 2008,
    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/5438/
  4. “The adoption of bioengineered crops”, US Department of Agriculture Report, May 2002
  5. “Glyphosate-resistant soyabean cultivar yields compared with sister lines”, Elmore, R.W. et al., Agronomy Journal, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2001, pp. 408–412
  6. “Genetic engineering – a crop of hyperbole”, Doug Gurian-Sherman, The San Diego Union Tribune, 18 June 2008, http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080618/news_lz1e18gurian.html
  7. “Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in the United States: The first nine years”, Benbrook, C., BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper No. 7, October 2004,http://www.biotech-info.net/Full_version_first_nine.pdf;“Agricultural Pesticide Use in US Agriculture”, Center for Food Safety, May 2008, using data from US Department of Agriculture
  8. “Family Farmers Warn of Dangers of Genetically Engineered Crops”, Bill Christison, In Motion magazine, 29 July 1998, http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/genet1.html
  9. “International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development: Global Summary for Decision Makers (IAASTD)”, Beintema, N. et al., 2008,http://www.agassessment.org/index.cfm?Page=IAASTD%20Reports&ItemID=2713; accessed October 2008
  10. See, for example: “International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development: Global Summary for Decision Makers (IAASTD)”, Beintema, N. et al., 2008, http://www.agassessment.org/index.cfm?Page=IAASTD%20Reports
  11. “Feeding the world?”, J. N. Pretty, SPLICE (magazine of the Genetics Forum), Vol. 4, Issue 6, August/September 1998; “Organic agriculture and food security in Africa”, United Nations report, 2008,
    http://www.unep-unctad.org/cbtf/publications/UNCTAD_DITC_TED_2007_15.pdf
  12. “Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century”, Collard, B.C.Y. and D.J. Mackill, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, Vol. 363, 2008, pp. 557-572, 2008; “Breeding for abiotic stresses for sustainable agriculture”, Witcombe J.R. et al., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2008, Vol. 363, pp. 703-716
  13. “Gene mapping the friendly face of GM technology”, Professor John Snape, Farmers Weekly, 1 March 2002, p. 54
  14. Here is just a small selection of these papers: “Genetically modified soya leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality rate of rat pups of the first generation”, Ermakova I.V., EcosInform, Vol. 1, 2006, pp. 4-9; “Fine structural analysis of pancreatic acinar cell nuclei from mice fed on GM soybean”, Malatesta, M. et al., Eur. J. Histochem., Vol. 47, 2003, pp. 385–388;
  15. “Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analyses of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean”, Malatesta, M. et al., Cell Struct Funct., Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 173-180; “Ultrastructural analysis of testes from mice fed on genetically modified soybean”, Vecchio L. et al., Eur. J. Histochem., Vol. 48, pp. 448-454, 2004; “A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing”, Malatesta M. et al., Histochem Cell Biol.,  Vol. 130, 2008, pp. 967-977; “Effects of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine”, Ewen S.W. and A. Pusztai, The Lancet, Vol. 354, 1999, pp. 1353–1354; “New Analysis of a Rat Feeding Study with a Genetically Modified Maize Reveals Signs of Hepatorenal Toxicity”, Séralini, G.-E. et al., Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., Vol. 52, 2007, pp. 596-602.
  16. “Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract”, Netherwood T. et al., Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 22, 2004, pp. 204–209.
  17. “Detection of Transgenic and Endogenous Plant DNA in Digesta and Tissues of Sheep and Pigs Fed Roundup Ready Canola Meal”, Sharma, R. et al., J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 54, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1699–1709; “Assessing the transfer of genetically modified DNA from feed to animal tissues”, Mazza, R. et al., Transgenic Res., Vol. 14, No. 5, 2005, pp. 775–784; “Detection of genetically modified DNA sequences in milk from the Italian market”, Agodi, A., et al., Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, Vol. 209, 2006, pp. 81–88
  18. “Trans Fats: The story behind the label”, Paula Hartman Cohen, Harvard Public Health Review, 2006, http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/review/rvw_spring06/rvwspr06_transfats.html
  19.  “Risky business: Economic and regulatory impacts from the unintended release of genetically engineered rice varieties into the rice merchandising system of the US”, Blue, Dr E. Neal, report for Greenpeace, 2007, http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/risky-business.pdf
  20.  “Seeds of doubt: North American farmers’ experience of GM crops”, Soil Association, 2002, http://www.soilassociation.org/seedsofdoubt
  21.  “Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible?”, Binimelis, R., Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 2, April 2008
  22. “Choice: Less can be more”, Roger Levett, Food Ethics magazine, Vol. 3, No. 3, Autumn 2008, p. 11, http://www.foodethicscouncil.org/node/384
  23. See, for example, Marie-Monique Robin’s documentary film, “Le Monde Selon Monsanto” (“The World According to Monsanto”), ARTE, 2008; and the website of the NGO, Coalition Against Bayer-Dangers, www.cbgnetwork.org
  24. GM company Monsanto has launched many such lawsuits launched against farmers. A famous example is the case of the Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser. Just one article on this case is “GM firm sues Canadian farmer”, BBC News Online, 6 June 2000,
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/779265.stm
  25.  “Monsanto ”Seed Police” Scrutinize Farmers”, Stephen Leahy, InterPress Service, 15 January 2004, http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0115-04.htm

 

Also read:

The Raw Truth About Arctic Apples — Time to Invest in GMO Stocks?

Dairy Products, Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease

The Evil Molecule Lurking in Your Dairy Products

22606280 - cow skull Basically, Jim Cross, the original author of this article, doesn’t actually have a problem with dairy products, just the “A1” variant we have today in most countries. However, there is actually NO incentive at all for modern farmers to learn about this problem, let alone do something about it. So we are all basically stuck with a type of milk that is the worst type of all, and is responsible for many of today’s “diseases of civilization!” A good reason to think about becoming vegan and dairy-free!

A2 beta-casein is the type of beta-casein that cows have produced since before they were first domesticated thousands of years ago. It is considered safe and nutritious and has no known negative effects on human health. In the last few thousand years, a mutation occurred in European dairy herds that changed the beta-casein they produced. This new type of beta-casein — as A1 beta-casein — is common in the big black-and-white cow breeds of European descent. Sadly, it is the A1 producing cows that are used to produce the majority of milk in Europe and America today!

When digested, A1 beta-casein (not the A2 variety) releases beta-casomorphin7 (BCM7), an opioid with a structure similar to that of morphine. BCM7 may be the biggest troublemaker. Numerous tests have shown that blood from people with autism and schizophrenia contains higher levels of BCM7.

Richard Deth, a professor of pharmacology at Northeastern University in Boston, did a study which showed that the presence of high amounts of BCM7 causes a shortage of antioxidants in neural cells, a condition tied to autism.

If you are not even a vegan but still want to be as free as possible from diet-related diseases, try to find healthier A2 type milk. However, it is almost impossible to find in America, so I suggest you STOP using all dairy products entirely!

“Every body needs milk” – or does it? Or are some types of milk more favorable than others for specific people? I tend to favor the latter statement after research that I have uncovered. I am not going to reconstruct the original research of the beta-casomorphin-7 (BCM-7) molecule. This is the result of tireless work by many scientists. I am just going to try to bring their hard work together and illuminate the big clinical picture.

The key information stems from published scientific papers that will be listed. Some dairy people are not interested in having this information disseminated. They think that it will damage their industry. I think that this information can help more people become tolerant of ingesting dairy products, which in the long run will only benefit their industry. Anyway, integrity in research requires that we need to follow whatever path the evidence leads to. I call this the scientific attitude. Unfortunately, this isn’t always the case in real life. Nancy Wertheimer, who passed away in 2008, initially linked electromagnetic fields to cancer, for which she was vilified even though she was just asking a question as a result of her research.

The Basics of Milk 101

Cow’s milk can be broken down into 7 primary ingredients (Figure 1). (3) The most prolific is plain old water at approximately 88%. Next is protein at about 3% or 4%, of which 80% or so is casein and 20% or so is whey. Milk proteins also contain all 8 essential amino acids required by humans. Depending on the type of milk, the fat content varies from 3% to 6%. In around 5% of milk lurks the potentially evil carbohydrate lactose. Next, milk contains a fair amount of the water-soluble B vitamins and vitamin C, a large portion of which are destroyed during pasteurization. Cow’s milk also contains vitamins A, D, E, and a small amount of K, which are mostly removed in our society’s quest to consume lower-fat or nonfat products. Finally, there are minerals in milk, primarily calcium and phosphorus. Unfortunately, soluble and assimilable calcium in milk is reduced again via that unnecessary step of pasteurization.

Figure 1

The serum (whey) protein family consists of approximately 50% ß-lactoglobulin, 20% a-lactalbumin, and a smattering of less prevalent molecules: blood serum albumin, immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, transferrin, and many minor proteins and enzymes. Each whey protein has its own characteristic composition and variations. Whey proteins do not contain phosphorus. They do contain many amino acids that have sulfur, which form disulfide bonds within the protein. Denaturation can break the disulfide bonds and is an advantage in yogurt production because it increases the amount of water that the proteins can bind, which improves the texture of the yogurt.

The casein family of protein consists of several types of caseins: alpha (a), beta (b), and kappa (k) caseins. The high phosphate content of the casein family allows it to associate with calcium and form calcium phosphate salts. The abundance of phosphate allows milk to contain much more calcium than would be possible if all the calcium were dissolved in solution. Casein proteins provide a good source of calcium for milk consumers if the milk is not pasteurized.

Also, as a result of where caseins reside in milk, they will only be present in the milk-solid portion of cow’s milk. They are not present in the fat portion and will, as a result, not be present in butter. In addition, caseins are not present in the liquid portion or the whey. Butter and whey products will not have beta-caseins and thus will not cause problems in individuals who have problems with A1 milk.

A2 versus A1 Milk and Beta-Casomorphin-7

Numerous references have begun to reveal how diseases, such as type 1 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, are linked to a tiny protein fragment that is formed during the digestion of the A1 beta-casein, BCM-7. This protein fragment in dairy products is produced by cows in the US, New Zealand, Australia, and many other Western countries. Milk that contains A1 beta-casein is known as A1 milk, whereas milk that does not is called A2 milk. Originally all milk was A2 until a mutation affecting Holstein cattle occurred some 8000 years ago.4 This mutation has been passed on to many other breeds, because Holsteins have been used to genetically improve the production of most other breeds. Herds in much of Asia, Africa, and parts of southern Europe remain naturally high in A2 cows. Also, interestingly, the human beta-casein molecule consists only of the A2 type, which means that breast milk releases no BCM-7. In addition, human milk contains primarily whey proteins, whereas cow’s milk has about 80% of its protein as casein. Finally, goats and yaks only produce A2 caseins, and most sheep milk is A2.

A2 beta-casein is found in all types of bovine animals, including all Western, African, and Indian cattle and water buffalo. A1 beta-casein is carried by some cows of European breeds, all of which belong to the subspecies Bos taurus.5 African and Asian cattle belong to the Bos indicus subspecies. However, the prevalence of the A2 and A1 beta-casein allele varies between cow herds and also between countries. For instance, a recent study on the beta-casein allele frequency in indigenous Indian cattle (Bos indicus) and river buffalo breeds reported 99% to 100% presence of the A2/A2 genotype in its indigenous cow and buffalo breeds.6 The same study also reported an absence of the A1/A1 genotype in indigenous Indian cow and buffalo breeds. Turning to European breeds, the Holstein, the most common dairy cow breed in Australia, Northern Europe, and the US, carries the A1 and A2 beta-casein alleles in approximately equal distribution. Jersey herds typically have an A2 allele frequency somewhat higher than this, but with considerable between-herd variation. The Guernsey breed has an A2 beta-casein allele frequency of more than 90%.7

The difference between the A1 and A2 type beta-casein variants is a single amino acid substitution at the 67th residue of the 209-amino acid beta casein protein chain (Figure 2).8 This difference in structure results in A1 beta-casein. The beta-casein protein consists of 209 amino acids strung together. The sole difference between A1 and A2 amazingly takes place at amino acid position 67, where histidine is substituted for proline. The proline forms a tight bond with amino acids on either side of it, but histidine does not. In our digestive tracts, because of the weakness of the peptide bonds with histidine, a peptide consisting of 7 amino acids breaks off. This peptide is BCM-7 and is also an opioid peptide.9

Figure 2

A recent study in humans has confirmed that BCM-7 is produced in the digestive system following the intake of milk casein protein.10 This study found detectable bovine BCM-7 in the small intestinal effluents of adults fed 30 grams of milk casein protein. BCM-7 has the demonstrated potential to elicit opioid activity via its affinity to mu-opioid receptors on a range of tissues and systems including the digestive tract, neurological system, and immune system.11–15 Giving naloxone with A1 milk will neutralize those opioid properties.16 BCM-7 can also be hydrolyzed further to produce the shorter exorphin with greater opioid receptor binding affinity, beta-casomorphin-5 (BCM-5).17

Due to the large size, it should be difficult for BCM-7 to pass through the gastrointestinal mucosal barrier.18 Many Americans suffer from leaky gut syndrome, which unfortunately facilitates the entry of BCM-7 into their bloodstreams. To possibly confirm this association, BCM-7 has been found in the urine of some people diagnosed with leaky gut. BCM-7 is also released when milk is pasteurized before it can be digestively produced in our guts. The vast majority of milk in the US is pasteurized.

Ischemic Heart Disease

There is epidemiological evidence that links A1 beta-casein and ischemic heart disease (IHD) and also pharmacological evidence linking A1 beta-casein to oxidation of LDL. Let us look at epidemiology first.

Corran McLachlan discovered some very interesting information on the epidemiological connection between A1 milk and IHD. In Figures 3 and 4, WHO 1990 IHD death rate data for males over 65 years old and females over 65 years old are presented against A1 consumption (excluding cheese).19 The results were remarkable. The correlation between IHD and A1 beta-casein consumption was very high, at 0.84 for men and 0.73 for women. The statistical probability here is less than 1 in a 1000.

Figure 3

Figure 4

The rationale behind the exclusion of cheese is that the subsequent enzymatic action that takes place as cheese ages causes alterations in the casein structure. This leads to chemical changes in individual casein molecules, which decreases the amount of BCM-7 available to be absorbed. Several people have confirmed the absence of BCM-7 in a variety of cheeses.20,21 Thus, the release of BCM-7 is much lower from cheese than from fresh milk.

There also exists a significant correlation for A1 beta-casein consumption and IHD mortality in 8 states of the former West Germany (Figure 5).22 Regional variations in b-casein A1 consumption may be estimated in West Germany, where cattle breed distribution data by state have been recorded since the 1950s, and breed distribution remained constant from 1951 to 1984.23,24 The daily consumption of the b-casein A1 allele was calculated using 1965 breed distributions and the FAO consumption data. They show a statistically relevant relationship between the amount of A1 casein consumed and the IHD death rate/100,000 people from 1977 to 1979 in males of all ages.

Figure 5

A research program called Prime investigated the relationship of several risk factors to IHD incidence and mortality rates in Northern Ireland and France.25 Data showed that cardiovascular event rates were 2.3 to 2.5 times more frequent in Belfast than in Lille or Strasbourg and 3.3 times more frequent in Belfast than in Toulouse.26 There were no important differences in macronutrient intake, although saturated fat intake was significantly higher in Belfast and dietary cholesterol was significantly higher in Toulouse. IHD mortality rate in Northern Ireland was about 3 times higher than in France without major differences in classical risk factors. The A1 beta-casein consumption in Northern Ireland is also about 3-fold higher than the cities in France (excluding cheese).

Around the world, there are also communities who are recorded as having extremely low rates of IHD but who drink milk, such as the Masai and Samburu in Kenya. They obtain their milk from Zebu cattle, which all contain the A2 beta-casein allele. Tibetan highlanders’ source of milk, the yak, also does not have the beta-casein A1 allele and they share similarly low rates of IHD.27

With regard to pharmacological evidence, BCM-7 has also been shown to catalyze the oxidation of low density lipoprotein.28 Oxidized LDL (oxLDL) is considered a useful marker of heart disease, according to many cardiologists who consider it the main molecule responsible for initial injury to the cardiac endothelium.29 LDL oxidation is also considered to be one of the initiators of endothelial damage. In addition, oxLDL is associated with cholesterol accumulation in vascular walls, and elevated plasma oxLDL has been found in patients with arteriosclerosis.30,31 The tyrosine amino acid on the end of BCM-7 gives it strong oxidative capability, especially since the tyrosine radical has been found in atherosclerotic lesions.32 Torreilles and Guerin found that peptides from casein-derived peptides could act as a catalyst for the oxidation of human LDLs.33

A study in human infants fed a dairy products based formula found elevated serum levels of antibodies to oxLDL relative to breast-fed babies.34 The formula contained A1 milk. Since BCM-7 has already been shown (above) to oxidize LDL, it is possible that the BCM-7 present in the formula caused the oxidation of the LDL molecules. Although the researchers in this study did not assess serum BCM-7 levels in these infants, they suggested, “As human milk does not contain beta-casein A1 and infant formulas are based on bovine milk, we can express a hypothesis that beta-casein A1 is the substance, which caused increased production of IgoxLDL.”35

Annand has pointed out that the introduction of pasteurization in the UK around the early 1920s coincided with a near doubling of heart disease mortality.36  Holder pasteurization, which caused milk to develop a slightly cooked flavor, was generally replaced by the high-temperature short-time (HTST) pasteurization process in the late 1940s to mid 1960s, depending on the country. HTST pasteurization was almost universally adopted by 1980.37 The US was the first country to introduce pasteurization of milk, around 1900. Ostler in 1910 reported an increased heart disease prevalence that had been observed in the US.38  It is unknown which of these two possible effects of HTST, whether the heat treatment of milk prior to consumption affects the transmission of b-casein through the gut wall or whether it contributes to greater production of specific casein fragments, is the main culprit and this remains to be established. However, the two factors, changes in pasteurization and differing b-casein allele frequencies between areas, in conjunction with changes in traditional risk factors, may provide an explanation for the historical changes in IHD and regional variations in the disease.

Type 1 Diabetes

Ecological evidence across 20 developed nations show strong correlations between the consumption of A1 beta-casein and the incidence of DM-1.39–42 Figure 6 shows this nicely.43 In addition, a recent study reported that A1 beta-casein consumption during early childhood may be more important than during adolescence for DM-1 development. Birgisdottir et al. (2006) compared A1 beta-casein consumption among 2-year-olds and among 11- to 14-year olds in Iceland and Scandinavia (i.e., Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Finland) and evaluated this against the incidence of DM-1.44 For the 2-year-olds, but not the 11- to 14-year olds, A1 beta-casein consumption correlated strongly with DM-1 incidence (r = 0.9; p = 0.037). They raise the possibility that intensive dairy cattle breeding may have emphasized a genetic variant in milk with adverse effects in humans. Further animal research and clinical trials would be needed to compare disease risks of A1-free versus “ordinary” milk.

Figure 6

A limited number of human trials also suggest that beta-casein may stimulate a T-cell immune response or an antibody immune response in the development of DM-1.45–48 For instance, Monetini et al. (2001) showed significantly higher levels of antibodies to beta-casein in bottle-fed infants under 4 months of age compared with exclusively breast-fed infants (p < 000.1) and significantly higher levels of antibodies in prepubertal children with DM-1 compared with age-matched controls (p = 0.03).49 How this should be interpreted is open to debate. It is possible that this is a manifestation of those with DM-1 being particularly sensitive to antibody reactions. However, in one of the only human studies to investigate differences in antibody response to A1 and A2 beta-casein, Padberg et al. (1999) showed that the ratio of A1 to A2 beta-casein antibodies was higher in those with DM-1 compared with case controls (p < 0.001).50 These results suggest that A1 beta-casein may be a modifier in the development of DM-1 in “at risk” individuals.

One mechanism by which A1 beta-casein may contribute to the development of DM-1 relates to the potential molecular mimicry (or cross-reactivity) between beta-casein and an epitope of the pancreatic beta-cell glucose transporter GLUT2, as autoantibodies to GLUT2 have been described in patients with recent-onset DM-1.51–53

A second mechanism involves the potential antigenic determination characteristic of beta-casein, which may lead to the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta-cells.54 More specifically, Cavallo et al. (1996) have suggested that there may be molecular mimicry between a sequence of the beta-casein protein and an epitope of the GLUT2 transporter, which may give rise to autoantibodies capable of targeting pancreatic beta-cells.55

Currently, the role of bovine BCM-7 in the health and development of human infants is the topic of extensive scientific debate. Such debate was stimulated recently with the publication by Russian scientists, Kost et al. (2009), who found that BCM-7 could be measured in the blood of infants fed cow’s milk formula.56 The higher blood levels of bovine BCM-7 found in some infants correlated with delays in psychomotor development.57

Clinical Stories

I have heard about some people who switched from type A1 to A2 milk and had their milk intolerance disappear. One patient was a Czech who had escaped in 1962 from Czechoslovakia, was raised in Switzerland, and came to the US as an adult. He could not tolerate any dairy products here. He went to a farmers’ market in Portland, Oregon, where he saw advertised that they only sold milk from A2 cows. He decided to try their cheese and milk and, voilà, his milk intolerance was gone, as long as he only drank the A2 milk.

Another patient has found that his severe chronic lower back and morning stiffness has almost completely disappeared after he switched to only A2 milk. These symptoms had been present almost continuously for 20 years. He feels as if a miracle has happened.

Another patient said she used to avoid drinking milk in the evenings because it would make her legs jerky. She has now consumed A2 milk in the evening several times and that has not happened. On a recent night she had symptoms again and thought that maybe it was not the A1 after all. Then she remembered that she had eaten a salad with feta cheese that was made from A1 milk.

Potential Genetic Solution

The solution to the problem is both simple and unbelievably cheap. All that is required is for farmers to ensure that their cows are inseminated, naturally or artificially, with semen from A2/A2 bulls. In New Zealand, some of the smaller groups of dairy farmers, predicting the increase in consumer demand for A2 milk, have already converted their herds to A2 cows.

The A1 gene can be bred out of a herd in about 10 to 15 years simply by choosing what are called A2/A2 sires. This means that neither the dam or sire carries the A1 gene.58 Unfortunately, until the consumer is educated and begins to request A2 milk, the motive will not be there for the selective breeding in most dairies. Interestingly, New Zealand labels A2 milk in its grocery stores.

What can you do? You can ask your providers of local milk if they are breeding for A2/A2 milk. If they do not understand it, you can refer them to this article. You could also consider purchasing your own milk goats (they do not carry the A1 gene), buy a cow with A2 genetics, or buy a cow with the plan to breed A2 genetics and select future heifers.

References
  1. Nancy Wertheimer, who linked magnetic fields to childhood leukemia, dies [online article]. Microwave News. http://microwavenews.com/news-center/nancy-wertheimer-who-linked-magnetic-fields-childhood-leukemia-dies.
  2. Milk protein [online article]. Milk Facts. http://www.milkfacts.info/Milk%20Composition/Protein.htm
  3. Woodford K. Devil in the Milk: Illness, Health and Politics: A1 and A2 Milk. Wellington, NZ: Craig Potton Publishing; 2007.
  4. Ng-Kwai-Hang KF, Grosclaude F. Genetic polymorphism of milk proteins. In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, eds. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002:737–814.
  5. Woodford. Op cit.
  6. Mishra BP, Mukesh M, Prakash B, et al. Status of milk protein, ß-casein variants among Indian milch animals. Ind J Anim Sci. 2009;79(7):722–725.
  7. Scientific Report of EFSA prepared by a DATEX Working Group on the potential health impact of beta-casomorphins and related peptides. EFSA Scientific Report. 2009;231:1–107; cited 3 October 2011.
  8. Woodford. Op cit.
  9. Jinsmaa Y, Yoshikawa M. Enzymatic release of neocasomorphin and beta-casomorphin from bovine beta-casein. Peptides. 1999;20(8):957–962.
  10. Boutrou R, Gaudichon C, Dupont D, et al. Sequential release of milk protein-derived bioactive peptides in the jejunum in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(6):1314–1323.
  11. Zoghbi S, Trompette A, Claustre J, et al. Beta-Casomorphin-7 regulates the secretion and expression of gastrointestinal mucins through a mu-opioid pathway. Am J Physiol
  12. Claustre J, Toumi F, Trompette A, et al. Effects of peptides derived from dietary proteins on mucus secretion in rat jejunum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;283(3):G521–528.
  13. Sun Z, Cade JR. A peptide found in schizophrenia and autism causes behavioral changes in rats. Autism. 1999;3(1):85–95.
  14. Elitsur Y, Luk GD. Beta-casomorphin (BCM) and human colonic lamina propria lymphocyte proliferation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;85(3):493–437.
  15. Kayser H, Meisel H. Stimulation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes by bioactive peptides derived from bovine milk proteins. FEBS Lett. 1996;383(1–2):18–20.
  16. Elliott RB, Wasmuth HE, Bibby NJ, Hill JP. The role of beta-casein variants in the induction of insulin-dependent diabetes in the non-obese diabetic mouse and humans. Seminar on Milk protein Polymorphism. IDF Special Issue no. 9702. International Dairy Federation, Brussels; 1997.
  17. Henschen A, Lottspeich F, Brantl V, Teschemacher H. Novel opioid peptides derived from casein (beta-casomorphins). II. Structure of active components from bovine casein peptone. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1979;360(9):1217–1224
  18. The A1 vs A2 milk story. MSCC Newsletter. December 2007;69. Available at  http://www.maternity.org.nz/pdfs/THE%20A1%20vs%20A2%20MILK%20CONTROVERSY.pdf
  19. McLachlan CN. b-casein A1, ischaemic heart disease mortality, and other illnesses. Med Hypotheses. 2001;56(2):262–272.
  20. Muehlenkamp MR, Warthesen JJ. b-casomorphins: analysis in cheese and susceptibility to proteolytic enzymes from Lactococcus lactis ssp Cremoris. J Dairy Sci. 1996;79:20–26.
  21. Jarmolowska B, Kostyra E, Krawczuk S, Kostyra H. b-casomorphin-7 isolated from Brie cheese. J Sci Food Agric. 1999;79:1788–1792.
  22. McLachlan. Op cit.
  23. Weniger JH, Augustini C. Production characters of German cattle breeds. World Rev Anim Prod. 1967;14:62–64.
  24. ECC Facts & Figures. Thames Ditton, Surrey: Milk Marketing Board;1977–1989.
  25. Evans AE, Ruidavets JB, McCrum EE, et al. Autres pays, autres coeurs? Dietary patterns, risk factors and ischaemic heart disease in Belfast and Toulouse. Q J Med. 1995;88:469–477.
  26. Yarnell JWG. The PRIME study: classical risk factors do not explain the several fold differences in risk of coronary heart disease between France and Northern Ireland. QJM. 1998;91:667–676.
  27. Kawamoto Y, Namikawa T, Adachi A, et al. A population genetic study on Yaks, cattle and their hybrids in Nepal using milk protein variations. Animal R Tech. 1992;63:563–575.
  28. Torreilles J, Guerin MC. Casein-derived peptides can promote human LDL oxidation by a peroxidase-dependent and metal-independent process. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1995;189(5):933–942.
  29. Holvoet P, Mertens A, Verhamme P, et al. Circulating oxidized LDL is a useful marker for identifying patients with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001 May;21(5):844–848.
  30. Avogaro P, Bon GB, Cazzolato G. Presence of a modified low density lipoprotein in humans. Arteriosclerosis. 1988 Jan–Feb;8(1):79–87.
  31. Holvoet P, Perez G, Zhao Z, Brouwers E, Bernar H, Collen D. Malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic disease. J Clin Invest. 1995 Jun;95(6):2611–2619.
  32. Heinecke JW. Mass spectrometric quantification of amino acid oxidation products in proteins: insights into pathways that promote LDL oxidation in the human artery wall. FASEB J. 1999;13:1113–1120.
  33. Torreilles J, Guerin MC. Casein-derived peptides can promote human LDL oxidation by a peroxidase-dependent and metal independent process. [In French.] Compt Rendu Seances Soc Biol Filial. 1995;189:933–945.
  34. Steinerova A, Korotvicka M, Racek J, et al. Significant increase in antibodies against oxidized LDL particles (IgoxLDL) in three-month old infants who received milk formula. Atherosclerosis. 2004 Mar;173(1):147–148.
  35. Ibid.
  36. Annand JC. Hypothesis: heated milk protein and thrombosis. J Atheroscl. 1967;7:798–801.
  37. homas E. L. Trends in milk flavour. J Dairy Sci. 1981;64: 1023–102764.
  38. Ostler W. The Lumleian lectures on angina pectoris. Lancet. 1910;1:697–702,839–844.
  39. Elliott RB, Harris DP, Hill JP, at al. Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and cow milk: casein variant consumption. Diabetologia. 1999;42(3):292–296.
  40. Thorsdottir I, Birgisdottir BE, Johannsdottir IM, et al. Different beta-casein fractions in Icelandic versus Scandinavian cow’s milk may influence diabetogenicity of cow’s milk in infancy and explain low incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Iceland. Pediatrics. 2000;106(4):719–724.
  41. Laugesen M, Elliott R. Ischaemic heart disease, Type 1 diabetes, and cow milk A1 beta-casein. N Z Med J. 2003;116(1168):U295.
  42. Birgisdottir BE, Hill JP, Harris DP, Thorsdottir I. Variation in consumption of cow milk proteins and lower incidence of Type 1 diabetes in Iceland vs the other 4 Nordic countries. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2002;15(4):240–245.
  43. Laugesen M, Elliott R. Ischaemic heart disease, Type 1 diabetes, and cow milk A1 beta-casein. N Z Med J. 2003;116(1168):U295.
  44. Birgisdottir BE, Hill JP, Thorsson AV, Thorsdottir I. Lower consumption of cow milk protein A1 beta-casein at 2 years of age, rather than consumption among 11- to 14-year-old adolescents, may explain the lower incidence of type 1 diabetes in Iceland than in Scandinavia. Ann Nutr Metab. 2006;50(3):177–183.
  45. Monetini L, Barone F, Stefanini L, et al. Establishment of T cell lines to bovine beta-casein and beta-casein-derived epitopes in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Endocrinol. 2003;176(1):143–150.
  46. Banchuin N, Boonyasrisawat W, Vannasaeng S, et al. Cell-mediated immune responses to GAD and beta-casein in type 1 diabetes mellitus in Thailand. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002;55(3):237–245.
  47. Cavallo MG, Fava D, Monetini L, et al. Cell-mediated immune response to beta casein in recent-onset insulin-dependent diabetes: implications for disease pathogenesis. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):926–928.
  48. Cavallo MG, Monetini L, Walker BK, et al. Diabetes and cows’ milk. Letter. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):1655.
  49. Monetini L, Cavallo MG, Stefanini L, et al. Bovine beta-casein antibodies in breast- and bottle-fed infants: their relevance in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;17(1):51–54.
  50. Padberg S, Schumm-Draeger PM, Petzoldt R, et al. The significance of A1 and A2 antibodies against beta-casein in type-1 diabetes mellitus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999;124(50):1518–1521.
  51. Cavallo MG, Fava D, Monetini L, et al. Cell-mediated immune response to beta casein in recent-onset insulin-dependent diabetes: implications for disease pathogenesis. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):926–928.
  52. Pozzilli P. Beta-casein in cow’s milk: a major antigenic determinant for type 1 diabetes? J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(7):562–567.
  53. Inman LR, McAllister CT, Chen L, et al. Autoantibodies to the GLUT-2 glucose transporter of beta cells in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of recent onset. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(4):1281–1284.
  54. Pozzilli P. Beta-casein in cow’s milk: a major antigenic determinant for type 1 diabetes? J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(7):562–567.
  55. Cavallo MG, Fava D, Monetini L, et al. Cell-mediated immune response to beta casein in recent-onset insulin-dependent diabetes: implications for disease pathogenesis. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):926–928.
  56. De Noni I, Cattaneo S. Occurrence of beta-casomorphins 5 and 7 in commercial dairy products and in their digests following in vitro simulated gastro-intestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2010;119(2):560–566.
  57. Ibid.
  58. Schlabach F. What is A1 versus A2 milk? [online article]. Handpicked Nation. Jan. 2, 2013. http://www.handpickednation.com/what-is-a1-versus-a2-milk.
Acknowledgements 

I would sincerely like to thank Dr. Keith Woodford. I conceived the idea of writing this article after reading his brilliant book about A1/A2 milk, Devil In the Milk. He is a truly independent thinker and researcher who follows a true scientific attitude — follow the evidence unbiasedly no matter where it leads.

Jim Cross graduated with a degree in biology from the University of California at Davis in 1975 and with a secondary teaching credential in life science from California State University in 1976. He became part of the first-year class at Pacific College of Naturopathic Medicine in little Monte Rio in Sonoma County, California and finished his naturopathic studies at National College of Natural Medicine in Portland, Oregon in 1984. He later earned his LAc at San Francisco College of Acupuncture in 1989. He has practiced acupuncture and naturopathy in the tiny Northern Sierra town of Quincy, California since 1990. Dr. Cross also taught at American College of Traditional Chinese Medicine in San Francisco from 1999 to 2005. He has taught  classes on nutrition, optimal health, and treatment of chronic health challenges like addiction, obesity and cardiovascular disease.

Original article courtesy of The Townsend Letter.

Also read:

 

The 2nd Most Important Molecule in Your Body – Say Hello to ATP!

Avoiding Sugar & Fruit When Starting a Raw Food Diet & Lifestyle

Raw food and sugar from a little fruitFruit Sugar Chart is fine on a raw food diet, which is normally fairly low in sugar anyway.  But I always recommend avoiding fruits and their sugar content when first starting. You see, your body has probably been corrupted by a S.A.D. (Standard American Diet). As a result, you’re probably over-sensitive to sugars of every kind! This extreme reaction is NOT a natural response to sugar — its an over-reaction by the pancreas to a lifetime of consuming refined sugars at every meal!

The Islets of Langerhans

The Islets of Langerhans are clusters of 3,000 to 4,000 cells (1-2% of the pancreas) that regulate blood sugar. When these cells are damaged by a lifetime of abuse, they can over-react whenever you eat any sugar causing you to “crash” after a sugar “rush.” The answer for most people is a nice cup of coffee — which I also do not recommend!

Sometimes the Islets of Langerhans just shut down completely and stop making insulin, the hormone you need to convert sugar into energy. So to balance out this over-reaction to sugar as you try to get return to a natural state of health, I recommend avoiding any added sugars as well as most fruits while your bodies re-adjust. This can take a few months up to a year or more.

There are several kinds of sugars to avoid when starting out on a vegan lifestyle. Table or granulated sugar, called sucrose, is the most obvious. But the body hydrolyzes sucrose into fructose and glucose, so we need to avoid those as well. Other ‘disaccharides’ to avoid include maltose and lactose, which are not technically classified as sugars and sometimes are used as artificial sweeteners. Remember, even fresh organic fruits contain some fructose so try to avoid these until you rehabilitate your pancreas.

ATP – the Second Most Important Molecule in Your Body after DNA.

One of the most important molecules in your 59198302 -chemical formula of ATPbody is ATP (adenosine triphosphate) — the main source of energy for all your cells. ATP is the highest energy source in the human body, used to build the more complex molecules that make your muscles work, generate electricity in your nerves — and even generate the light in fireflies. Virtually all living things produce ATP, powering every function of every cell in every biological organism on Earth.

All organisms, from the simplest bacteria to people, use ATP as their primary energy currency. The energy it carries is just the right amount for most all your biological reactions. Yes, the nutrients you consume contain some energy, but that is not in a form your cells can use for most of their work.

All the 100 trillion human cells (approximately) in your body contain about 1,000,000,000 ATP molecules. Sounds like a lot, however that is only about 50 grams of ATP, enough for just a few minutes so it must be continuously recycled.

Our body designed to get most of its energy from ATP, which stores its energy until you need it then converts at a ratio of 32:2. But after a lifetime of eating tons of sugar, your body has almost forgotten how to make ATP so is now almost totally dependent on glucose for all its energy! Now it may even be hard to get through a day without drinks filled with caffeine and sugar.

So take all the time you need to make this transition with compassion for yourself by avoiding sugar at first. A little fruit, which doesn’t contain glucose, may diminish sugar cravings a bit, but that can make it harder to get all the sugar out of your diet.

Glucose

Your body gets most of it’s quick energy from glucose, which it converts to energy at a ratio of 2:1. The difference between 2:1 (for glucose) and 32:2 (for ATP) is almost impossible to imagine! The quick energy you get from Glucose is ideal for your ‘flight or fight’ mechanism — a burst of energy for when lions, wolves or a bill collector are chasing you down the street. It isn’t meant for normal, every day energy. But sadly, that is actually how most people get ALL their energy these days because we’ve all become addicted to sugar.

So its very important to take the time to train your taste buds to appreciate the natural sweetness in whole, organic raw foods. Some natural sweeteners are OK, but it is best to avoid any sweeteners at all so you’ll learn to appreciate the natural taste of fresh, healthy fruits and veggies the way that nature intended.

Fructose

Fructose is metabolized by your body very differently from glucose. The commercial food industry, of course, puts tons of fructose in everything so they can at least claim there isn’t any glucose. But the problem is that fructose isn’t converted to energy like glucose. It’s actually metabolized by the liver which turns fructose into liver fat inside that leads to chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease. Healthy organic fruits actually don’t contain that much fructose at all. The problem is that much we’ve been eating processed foods for years that are often sweetened with disgusting, unnatural amounts of fructose!

What about agave nectar?

If you always thought agave was natural, think again! Modern commercial agave nectar is as much as 92% fructose because it has been so commercialized that today it’s just a profitable business for greedy corporations and farmers. Most agave you can find today is nothing at all like traditional agave nectar made from the core of the plant (i.e., the “pina”).  Today’s commercial agave is mostly made from the sap of the giant root — virtually the opposite of the pina. The main ingredients in agave roots are mostly just chains of fructose molecules … not really traditional agave syrup at all!

These days you can’t even find real agave nectar, although agave marketing is totally dependent on the reputation of traditional agave. But traditional agave is extremely rare and expensive to make from only the core of the plant (the pina), but never the root!

Typically, even commercial agave syrup is processed at very low temperatures, so some raw foodists are fooled into thinking it is a raw food product. Commercial agave is NOT a raw food product at all — it’s very highly processed, regardless of the temperature. Actually, it is almost impossible to find traditional agave nectar made from the pina. The commercial form of agave is even higher in fructose than HFCS (high fructose corn syrup). So it’s best to avoid agave nectar entirely!

Selected References
  1. Behe, Michael. 1996. Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. The Free Press. New York.
  2. Darnell, James, Harvey Lodish, and David Baltimore. 1996. Molecular cell biology, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman. New York.
  3. Goodsell, David S. 1996. Our molecular nature. Springer-Verlag. New York.
  4. Hickman, Cleveland P. 1997. Integrated principles of zoology, 10th edition. William C. Brown/McGraw Hill. New York.
  5. Hickman, Cleveland P., Larry Roberts, and Allan Larson. 1997. The biology of animals, 7th edition. William C. Brown/McGraw Hill. New York.
  6. Hoagland, Mahlon and Bert Dodson. 1995. The way life works. Random House. New York.
  7. Jensen, Marcus, Donald Wright, and Richard Robinson. 1997. Microbiology for the health sciences, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  8. Kornberg, Arthur. 1989. For the love of enzymes. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
  9. Lim, Daniel. 1998. Microbiology, 2nd edition. William C. Brown/McGraw Hill. New York.
  10. Mader, Sylvia. 1996. Biology, 6th edition. William C. Brown. Dubuque, IA.
  11. McMurry, John and Mary Castellion. 1996. Fundamentals of general, organic, and biological chemistry, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  12. Ritter, Peck. 1996. Biochemistry, a foundation. Brooks/Cole. Pacific Grove CA.
  13. Talaro, Kathleen and Arthur Talaro. 1993. Foundations in microbiology. William C. Brown. Dubuque, IA.
  14. Trefil, James. 1992. 1001 Things everyone should know about science. Doubleday. New York.
  15. Campbell, Neil A.; Williamson, Brad; Heyden, Robin J. (2006).
  16. ‘Nature’s Batteries’ May Have Helped Power Early Lifeforms, “May 25, 2010. from the original on 27 May 2010
  17. Törnroth-Horsefield, S.; Neutze, R. (December 2008). “Opening and closing the metabolite gate,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (50): 19565–19566. PMID 10.1073/pnas.0810654106
  18. “History: ATP first discovered in 1929”. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1997,Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 2010-05-26
  19. Lodish, H.; Berk, A.; Matsudaira, P.; Kaiser, C. A.; Krieger, M.; Scott, M. P.; Zipursky, S. L.; Darnell, J. (2004). Molecular Cell Biology (5th ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. 978-0-7167-4366-8

Also see:

The Raw Truth: What You Probably Don’t Know About Agave Nectar

Equality, Freedom & Raw Food — Your Natural Rights!

How We Lost Our Freedom to Big Brother & the Corporate State

An oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people. These people might be from nobility, from wealthy families, from universities or from other sources of corporate, religious and military control. Oligarchies are typically controlled by a few prominent families who pass their influence on from one generation to the next or they could be from more recent wealth, but they have one thing in common — the belief that they know what’s best for everyone else — and it’s not raw food and liberty!

Since the founding of America, this “ruling class” has been working hard to turn the American experiment into a system that they can control…for our own good, of course! One of the most important ways they do this is to change the meaning of word like “equality” and “rights.”

Freedom, Terrorism & Raw Food“Equality of opportunity” is what’s in the U.S. Constitution. This type of equality is an essential part of American liberty, but it’s virtually extinct these days. Instead, over many decades we’ve been sold the idea that America is about “equality of outcomes.”  However, that is actually one of the tenants of socialism and has nothing to do with real American “equality.”

Raw Food and Liberty – Your Natural Rights

Our founding fathers fought and died for our “natural rights,” of which equality of opportunity is one part. Natural rights came into existence for the very first time when our forefathers were willing to fight for them. Before that most of the world only had “civil rights,” or rights granted to them by “civil authority,” or government. In other words, those “rights” weren’t natural at all, but were “privileges” granted to you by government. If that sounds familiar perhaps it’s because that’s how our government actually works today!

You see, we actually lost our real freedoms and liberties in America when we made corporations like Monsanto kings of the hill. Now these corporations are, under “the color of law,”legally” persons…just like you. But legally you and I are PEOPLE — not “persons.” The legal term “person” is actually derived from the Latin word “persona” and refers to an artificial identity, like a character in a play — very different from the actors true identity.

The Color of Food

If you are into health and nutrition like me this is very, very important. Under the “color of law,” which means it really isn’t law, we can actually lose our access to real, organic, healthy food! What we will be left with, legally speaking, is “the color of food,” things that look like food but nutritionally are not the same. With the advent of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), this is more possible than ever before.

Here’s the crux of the problem — if you and I are legally “persons” than we are now in the same status as corporations like Monsanto. Monsanto is a “person” under the color of law but unlike you and me Monsanto has billion and billions of dollars to convince politicians, advertisers, nutritionists and even doctors that their GMO produce is the same as non-GMO produce…which of course is ridiculous. But if you have enough money you can make the world believe whatever you like.

These corporations rule not by merely manipulating politics but by manipulating the very essence of life itself — our food (GMO’s), our air (chemtrails) and, ultimately, even our health (GMO’s, pharmaceuticals).  Keeping us sick, dumbed down and compliant, we casually accept things that could have caused a revolution not that long ago.

Discover a Lifestyle Based on Raw Food & Liberty!

The American people, and many around the globe, are waking up more and more every day! You can meet them all over the internet, from Facebook to Twitter.  We’re making new friends all across the globe, networking with groups that share our interests and spreading the word about what true equality really means to our country — and what raw food really means to our health. Our commitment to those fundamental concepts starts with committing to a lifestyle that is based on true freedom and liberty — the raw food lifestyle. Bur a raw food lifestyle doesn’t exist in a vacuum. In fact, if we surrender to the Monsanto’s of the world we can actually lose the right to grow, market and purchase raw, organic foods entirely!

So let’s all take a stand for Equality & Freedom — and Raw Foods, too!

Also Read:

Raw Food & Liberty – The Battle for Control of What You Think

Study: Alkaline Mineral Water Can Raise Your pH

We can all learn to question our cherished assumptions!

I’ve seen many alkaline mineral water “experts” on the internet regularly assert that alkaline mineral water is neutralized in the stomach and so can’t change blood pH at all. Never. Nope. Sorry. Because it can…and does!

This has been said many times to prove some point or other, even asserting it was such a basic, fundamental truth that it just cannot be disputed. Well now, here is a recent study that seems to prove them all completely wrong … as I always said on this website!

I’ve seen many so-called “experts” on the internet regularly assert that alkaline water is neutralized in the stomach and so it can’t change blood pH at all. However, it can and often does!

67347151 - alkaline waterIt turns out that alkaline mineral water actually can raise blood pH — at least when the conditions are right such as after physical activity). That means the pH of water survives our highly acidic digestive system with at least some of it’s alkalinity still intact. This study was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial that examined 52 men, and found that alkaline water raised blood pH in all of them — within the normal range for blood pH, of course.

Researchers discovered that drinking alkaline mineral water actually raised the men’s arterial blood pH by 0.04 to 0.07. That may sound like only a tiny change, but it isn’t. The normal range for your blood is a pH of 7.35 – 7.45. This means the normal pH range of the blood is only one-tenth of a pH!

A change of four one-hundredths to seven one-hundredths of a pH is a 40 – 70% increase of pH inside the normal range for your blood’s pH!

The effects of drinking alkaline mineral water were compared to the effects of drinking water with a neutral pH as a control. Drinking water with a neutral pH was not shown to have an effect on blood pH in this study. Researchers concluded, “These results support the hypothesis that HRW administration is safe and may have an alkalizing effect in young physically active men.”

This study is some of the strongest proof that alkaline water has health benefits because of the way it was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial — the gold standard in medical studies.

Alkaline Water Skeptics Neutralized

Stomach And Human DigestionAlkaline mineral water skeptics like to say that alkaline water is neutralized in the stomach. However, this study proves them wrong! Since we now know that alkaline water raises blood pH, it must survive the stomach and intestines with some alkalinity.

Of course, alkaline water cannot raise your blood pH outside the normal blood pH range. Bit it clearly does show that it is possible to raise blood pH towards the top of the normal range!

Most health experts recommend drinking alkaline mineral water with a pH of 9 – 9.5 daily. Drink a glass in the morning when you wake up and during the day drink as much alkaline water as you normally would. Exceptions include: (1) Stop drinking alkaline mineral water an hour before meals, and (s) Wait an hour after a meal before drinking. Remember, you don’t want it to dilute the digestive liquids in your stomach that are breaking down the food.

Alkaline mineral water is great to battle fatigue as well as muscular acidosis, and is the best water you can get while working out. For workouts drink the highest level pH water made by your ionizer from an hour before through the end of your workout. Afterwards resume drinking 9.5 pH alkaline water.

For heartburn, acid indigestion or reflux drink your maximum pH alkaline water. Don’t forget that alkaline water provides gradual relief, so don’t hesitate to take an antacid if you need t. At bedtime, drink a glass of alkaline water an hour before bed because it can help prevent a heart attack or stroke.

Metabolic syndrome is a chronic condition in which your pH balance is chronically low for several months or years. It’s like a constant state of acidosis. If you experience metabolic syndrome you’ll have at least 3 of these symptoms:

  • Obesity

  • High Blood Pressure

  • Kidney Stones

  • High blood sugar

  • High Cholesterol Levels

The lower your urine pH is the more metabolic syndrome symptoms you experience. Alkaline water can increase your urine pH, helping to fight metabolic syndrome. You don’t have to raise urine pH much to affect the symptoms as the difference between having them all the and perfect health is just half of one pH!

References

  1. Ostojic, Sergej, and Marko Stonanovic. “Hydrogen-Rich Water Affected Blood Alkalinity in Physically Active Men.” . Research in Sports Medicine: An International Journal, 06 Jan 2014. Web. 20 Feb 2014. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15438627.2013.852092>.
  2. Abraham, Guy, and Jorge Flebas. “The effect of daily consumption of 2 liters of electrolyzed water for 2 months on body composition and several physiological parameters in four obese subjects: a preliminary report.” Highbeam Research. Original Internist, 01 Sep 2011. Web. 2 Jul 2013. <http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-269433201.html>.
  3. Maalouf, N, M Cameron, and et al. Low Urine pH: A Novel Feature of the MetabolicSyndrome.”Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. American Society of Nephrology, 29 May 2007. Web. 2 Jul 2013. <http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/2/5/883.full.pdf>.
  4. Heil, P and Seifert, J. Influence of bottled water on rehydration following a dehydrating bout of cycling exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition  Springerlink July 2009. http://www.springerlink.com/content/kn41764j65165u3x/fulltext.pdf

Also read:

https://rawfoodlife.com/the-science-of-living-alkaline-water/

The Healing Properties of Honey

Is it OK for Vegans to use Honey for its Healing Properties?

With all the health challenges facing everyone these days, you may want to think about the healing properties of honey, even if not as part of your regular diet. For example, some people use honey to treat allergies. The alternative is allergy shots and prescription drugs. Which is more compassionate?

19791372 - bee flyingIt’s obvious that we shouldn’t limit our compassion to just mammals or fish. But you may not realize just how many insects are actually killed in the farming of all the “vegan” foods we rely on every single day. For the most part, bees are not seriously harmed in the production of honey. In fact, honey production is a rather small part of the total honey bee economy. Most of the money in bee-keeping comes from renting of hives to pollinate our beloved fruits and vegetables — which actually is more harmful than you may realize.

Bees are actually highly intelligent. I’ve seen amazing examples of that myself! And as pollinators they help us grow about 30 percent of all food! About 100 foods are dependent on commercial bees, including almonds, avocados, broccoli, cherries, cucumbers, lettuce, peaches, pears, plums, sunflowers, and tomatoes. But life for these bees may be far worse than it is for honey bees. Bee keepers transport hives sealed inside trucks, often with High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) as their only food for the journey. Yet, most vegans won’t go anywhere near HFCS themselves!

Further, when bees pollinate even organic fields, they leave behind, mixed in with all that food, their sweat and “blood” (called hemolymph). You can look only for foods pollinated by wild bees, of course. But for most vegans that probably isn’t very realistic. Some bees are just inevitably harmed in any large-scale agricultural operation, even on organic farms. They may not spray synthetic pesticides, but they do make use of natural chemicals. So all we’re really left with is to use more of our common-sense rather than a fanatical adherence to a policy we may not actually understand. For that reason many vegans exclude honey from their diet despite the many healing properties of honey.

Of course, all animal suffering should be avoided, but it seems to me that our standards should be reasonable. I basically use the same logic that vegans use to be unconcerned about the insects that smash on the windshield when we drive down the highway — though I personally I try to remember to pray for any insects that hit my windshield.

Buy from Local Organic Farmers Whenever Possible

15223896 finger in honey jarOn a final note, there actually is something in the honey industry that everyone, vegan or not, should worry about — mislabeled Chinese honey! Most Chinese honey, known for high levels of toxins, finds its way into our country illegally. In addition, Chinese industrial practices are far worse for the bees than anything we do in the America. So if you do decide to use a little honey for your allergies, please do your best to avoid corrupted and possibly toxic Chinese honey.

The best way to avoid  problems, as with everything else, is to buy as much as you can from your local organic farmer! Remember, honey bees forage for their nectar and pollen usually within about two miles, although have been seen foraging 2 or 3 times that far from the hive. So when buying “organic” honey, remember that the bees’ entire foraging needs to be free of those toxic chemicals. So a hive needs to be surrounded by at least 16 square miles of all organic plants!

Wild plants may seem OK at first.d but if the hives are near Dept. of Natural Resources lands that could be a problem since your government uses chemicals all the time, even in some remote areas. The list to avoid also includes non-organic farms, golf courses, residential neighborhood, and industrial areas.  Places where water may contain pollution and chemicals is also something to avoid.  Of course, genetically modified crops (GMO’s) are a definite forbidden zone, — and even needs a large buffer zone for the bees.  Basically, if the bees can reach any area that has chemicals, synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides or sludge, you can say goodbye to your organic honey — and it could take another 2-3 years to get re-certified.  This can makes organic honey virtually impossible to produce for many beekeepers.

How Honey Bees Live

42655064 - bee hivesClimate change, the over-use of inorganic pesticides and toxic chemicals, and generically-modified (GMO) crops have all severely damaged the sources of forage for all bees — and can affect the healing properties of honey, as well. That’s why it’s more important then ever to start doing more organic beekeeping. It’s essential to keep hives away from toxic pesticides and GMO crops!

Bees can fly for several miles, but usually go about 2 miles or so daily, so your farm needs to be at least that far from any chemical spraying or GMO crops. That farm down the road may be doing more harm that good if it isn’t organic. Honey bees also need lots of forage for plants like like clover, buckwheat, goldenrod and flowering trees. And, of course, you’ll need a nearby water source and plenty of nearby trees for protection from wind in winter. Hives also need some shade to prevent overheating and bees prefer southeast entrances facing the morning sun.

With bees disappearing these days from our industrial farming methods, its more important than ever to deal with parasites without chemicals — if they were ever necessary at all! You’ll need screened bottom boards, physical traps, and other pest management techniques to control pests.  Some milder, less toxic miticides ight be OK, like thyme-based ApiLifeVar and ApiGard as well as formic acid or oxalic acid.  Some of these ingredients may not be organic, but it’s probably alright as long as they are natural and not synthetic or toxic. If a treatment is designed to kill pests and other less beneficial insects (by human standards), bees probably won’t feel very good from them either. But once you get a strong colony thriving nothing will destroy it!

Let’s say you have the perfect organic land for your bee hives.  Now the beeswax foundation must also be organic, which is really difficult.  To make your own it has to be from your organic hives — which you don’t have because you can’t get that organic foundation! Plastic foundation can be used if coated with organic wax. But organic wax is hard to find.  Smaller apiaries that meet the other organic requirement could start with foundation-less hives then use that wax, but that takes a lot of time.

Finally, don’t expect to harvest you honey right away. It can take a couple of years to let a new hive strengthen and grow. After 3 years it’s okay to take some honey as long as there’s enough there and there’s no drought just be careful to leave enough honey for the bees to eat during winter because you could weaken a colony by taking too much of its stored food.

Respecting the Honey Bees

Finally, the best way to learn beekeeping is to locate an established organic beekeeper to become your mentor.  Choose someone who also appreciates bees and the unique healing properties of honey . Then, really put your heart into it together. Once you get to know your bee neighbors you learn when you can approach them and how. It’s a little like knowing which of your human neighbors doesn’t mind an occasional visit. The weather can also affects the behavior of bees.  In bad weather they’ll be stuck inside doing a lot of work. Also, it isn’t really necessary to smoke bees to calm them if you’re gentle and take your time. The goal is to always avoid provoking and overworking the bees.

Also Read:

Farming with Integrity … Organically!

Decline of the GMO Gangsters: Down But Far from Out!

For many years Monsanto and Friends have been saying that GMO crops (genetically modified organisms) and the chemicals they rely on, such as Roundup and glyphosate, are safe. In fact, they’re a bit infamous for actually suing organic farmers for patent infringement it the past — and winning!

Since 1997, just a year after Monsanto’s first GMO crop was approved by the FDA, the biotech company filed 150 lawsuits against family farmers. About 700 more were settled out of court. Since then, Monsanto has investigated more than 500 farmers annually!

28219887 GMO vs. OrganicToday, however, the tide is finally shifting. Monsanto and Friends have started losing lawsuits from farmers that have had crops destroyed by GMO-related contamination. Monsanto & Friends may have started losing a little ground when it comes to GMO’s, but they are well on the way to new developments like nanotechnology that could eventually replace GMO’s, and We the People may have to start over.

So, the Monsanto Mafia remains alive and well whatever short-term battles they lose. Some of their activities have been weakened but they are far from eliminated. They’ll always be working on the next technology to replace your real food with their laboratory experiments. There IS no “coexistence” with GMO crops or nanotechnologies. It just isn’t profitable enough for Monsanto! The real profit is in the patents on seeds and crops that come from their biotechnology — and that just cannot be allowed to compete with natural crops that have been growing just fine for millions of years.

The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture was working on a plan that to protect farmers from contamination of GMO crops — would you believe “contamination insurance!”  The plan was to shift responsibility for GMO’s to farmers instead of Monsanto and its evil minions.  This was of course based on a fundamental LIE — that GMO and conventional or organic crops can coexist. But the truth is that GMO pollen is spread by wind, insects, birds and animals so will eventually contaminate (i.e., think “destroy”) all organic and non-GMO crops. In fact,  you can bet that Monsanto is counting on it!

“The hope of the industry is that over time the market is so flooded that there’s nothing you can do about it. You just sort of surrender.” – Biotech consultant Don Westfall, Toronto Star, 2001

In a recent press release from the USDA:

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on Wednesday released an Organic Farming Practices Fact Sheet, which said organic crop production losses due to contamination by drift of prohibited substances, such as genetically engineered crops like corn and soy, are not insurable”

Organic farmers have tried to find ways to protect themselves. For example, finding corn seeds that have resistance to cross fertilization by GMO pollen. This may offer some protection for organic corn but it is far from foolproof. Instead of trying to find ways to coexist with GMO’s, farmers need to take a stronger stand against GMO technologies that actually cannot co-exist when they can change the DNA of non-GMO crops until all are contaminated. This represents a permanent change to the environment worldwide…not just a new variety of corn or whatever. Its a very big deal!

Monsanto Crops
A trademark of Monsanto with the same “Roundup Ready” genes.
ٔSo Monsanto & Friends should all be held accountable for any losses associated with

GMO crops and their contamination. When they have the actually pay into a fund to help farmers recover all the costs of GMO contamination maybe they’ll discover that GMO crops are far less profitable when you actually have to pay for all the long term costs to the marketplace, the farmers and the consumers around the world.

The responsibility for preventing contamination should NEVER be shared with farmers. That was an idea created by Monsanto & Friends! Non-GMO and organic farmers shouldn’t have to protect themselves from GMO’s at all. The idea of creating buffer zones and other nonsense was all Monsanto’s, to make it look like they don’t own all responsibility for the environmental impact of GMO’s through GMO-drift on the wind or whatever. If Monsanto is successful at setting a legal precedent that non-GMO farmers bear some responsibility for GMO contamination, it may spell the end of non-GMO and organic crops.

Contamination is definitely already occurring and is the most frequent reason for crops being rejected by buyers — which has already happened in China, of all places, when they rejected organic corn shipments that tested positive for GMO’s. And when the weather is particularly bad (high winds, storms, etc.) the risks of contamination goes way up, regardless of “buffer zones” and other nonsense promoted by Monsanto & Friends.

Costs of contamination are imposed at the marketing level as well as at the farm level. Growers, co-ops and grain marketing organizations incur many costs as well. Testing programs can costs thousands of dollars a year for farmers or co-ops.  If contamination is discovered then crops can no longer be sold for the original intended use. Then farmers have to sell the contaminated GMO crops for animal feed — which is far less profitable for the farmer — after they already spent a small fortune to certify and grow organic crops. GMO animal feed is also highly objectionable to people who don’t want to to be part of anything GMO.

Every contaminated load of GMO crops can cost farmers thousands of dollars if it has to be shipped back to the farm and then on to a different, less discerning buyer. So some farmers just go straight to the animal feed markets to reduce the hassle of trying to sell in markets with rigorous GMO testing. Needless to say, I don’t support the use of GMO’s for animals either!

Ultimately it is unrealistic to expect this issue to be resolved in the marketplace, which is just what GMO companies really want.

More Resources:

https://rawfoodlife.com/10-reasons-why-no-GMO

http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/1220?t=7&akid=1174.952702.0tBJpz

http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/1217?t=12&akid=1174.952702.0tBJpz

http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/1218?t=14&akid=1174.952702.0tBJpz

Revised & updated June, 2017.

Also read:

Disadvantages of Genetically Modified Crops (GMOs) – Don’t Believe the Industry Hype!

 

Whatever You Think About Monsanto & Friends, it’s Worse — GMO’s are an Attack on Life Itself!

Monsanto’s GMO’s, political corruption and falsified research has unleashed new microscopic “Frankensteins” that are already making animals & people sick and dramatically decreasing fertility. GMO’s are an attack on life itself! Perhaps you’ve seen the sci fi flick about a world with no children – well, here it comes!

Dr. Don Huber
Dr. Don Huber, acclaimed agricultural scientist
“…according to Dr. Don Huber, an agricultural scientist and expert in microbial ecology… Monsanto’s genetically engineered…crops are responsible for … an outbreak of new plant, animal and human diseases.”

Remember, to be a raw food vegan you have to eat raw, unprocessed, nutritionally-dense, toxin-free food. GMO’s are not only making that impossible — they are attacking life itself!

  • There are no peer-reviewed scientific studies on the safety of GMO’s — though there are several studies that have been funded by Monsanto and Friends that have been shown to be unreliable.
  • There are clinical and peer-reviewed scientific studies that clearly show the dangers of GMO’s.
  • Epidemiological studies have shown that there’s been a significant increase in over 30 human diseases that corresponds to the increased use of glyphosate and GMO’s in our food.
  • Glyphosate is not actually an herbicide. When it was initially patented, glyphosate was considered a mineral chelator that makes nutrients unavailable for your body. It’s also patented as an antibiotic that can damage the gut bacteria we need for proper digestion, further making many nutrients less available.

“You may have the mineral [in the plant], but if it’s chelated with glyphosate, it’s not going to be available physiologically for you to use, so you’re just eating a piece of gravel,”  — Dr. Don Huber

  • The EPA doubled the amount of glyphosate allowed in food. Today’s crops that are heavily sprayed with glyphosate (the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup) have lower nutrient density than organic foods and contain high amounts of pesticides known to be harmful to our health.

Glyphosate is also patented as an antibiotic—and a very effective one at that— against a large number of beneficial organisms. Unfortunately, like all antibiotics, it also kills vitally important beneficial soil bacteria and human gut bacteria.

“Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus faecalis—these are organisms that keep you healthy either by providing accessibility to the minerals in your food or producing many of the vitamins that you need for life. They’re also the natural biological defenses to keep Clostridium, Salmonella, and E.coli from developing in your system,” — Dr. Don Huber

Glyphosate was originally patented as a chelator in 1964 by Stauffer Chemical Co. Monsanto introduced as an herbicide in 1974. In 1996, Roundup Ready crops were introduced creating a sharp increase in Roundup use since it can be applied several times without damaging a crop. Then, to put the final nail in your coffin, Monsanto started using glyphosate as a ripening agent applied just before a harvest to ripen the crops — even for non-GMO crops!

Despite all the documented health risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is regularly approached by biotech companies asking for higher limits of this toxic chemical in your food.

GMO’s — an Attack on Life Itself.

GMO’s cannot coexist with conventional crops. All this is connected to the relationships between genes and their environment. When you disrupt these relationships you end up with a variety of effects that have never been studied at all. We actually don’t even know all the effects of this attack on life itself!

“We know how to get these genes in; we don’t know how to remove them…. If you have a gene that is spread by pollen, like Roundup Ready alfalfa, it’s just a matter of time before bees or the wind is going to transfer that particular pollen to every alfalfa crop that you’re going to grow…. for every one of those successful expressions that you get from genetic engineering, you have over a million other things that take place that are negative…. One of the things that we do know is that the genes that are being inserted are extremely promiscuous. They’re not stable.”Dr. Don Huber.

Research has shown that human cells are able to transfer GMO genes, actually adversely affecting the human genome — that’s you and me! University of Canterbury Professor Jack Heinemann released results from genetic research on GMO wheat that showed that molecules created in the wheat, designed to change its carbohydrate content, can potentially silence human genes, as well.

“If this silences the same gene in us that it silences in the wheat — well, children who are born with this enzyme not working tend to die by the age of about five.” – Judy Carman in Digital Journal:6

Heinemann’s research showed over several hundred pages of possible matches between GMO genes in the wheat with the human genome. Over a dozen of these were “extensive and identical and sufficient to cause silencing in experimental systems.” According to experts, this could create dangerous changes in the way glucose and carbohydrates are stored in our bodies.

Bee Die-Offs

According to Dr. Huber, there are several characteristics of bee colony collapse disorder that suggests glyphosate may be at least partly responsible:dreamstime_xs_70918441

  1. The bees are deficient in minerals, especially in micronutrients.
  2. There’s plenty of food but the bees are not able to use or digest it.
  3. The dead bees have no Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium, essential components of their digestive systems.

When exposed to glyphosate, bees become disoriented, suggesting endocrine hormone disruption. Neonicotinoid insecticides are endocrine hormone disruptors that have also been shown to make bees disoriented. According to Dr. Huber, a study on glyphosate commonly found in U.S. drinking water systems showed a 30% mortality rate for bees.

So today there is no way to truly know which foods contain GMO’s tainted with high levels of Roundup or glyphosate. Labeling would help and give you the opportunity to choose a different product.

When the EPA employed the term ‘substantially equivalent,’ it gave the chemical companies essentially a waiver on doing any of the safety tests. The only thing that they’ve ever tested for is acute toxicity. Well, we know that glyphosate, for instance, isn’t an acute toxin. It’s a serious chronic toxin. That’s been well-established in peer-reviewed scientific articles. We have more of those coming along all the time. There is no question that it’s a chronic toxin.” — Dr. Don Huber

According to Dr. Huber, 0.5 ppm of glyphosate is toxic to your endocrine system. 10 ppm is cytotoxic to kidney cells. Just 1 ppm is toxic to your liver. And a  mere 0.1-10 ppm is toxic to a whole range of human cellular functions. Think about that — and remember that we currently use nearly a BILLION pounds of glyphosate annually on crops worldwide. A study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology showed that glyphosate is probably the most harmful chronic toxin we’ve ever had to deal with!

The USDA is Ignoring this Major Threat to Your Health

In 2011, Dr. Huber wrote a letter to the head of the USDA about safety concerns for GMO crops. He also warned them about a new microscopic organism associated with Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) in soy found in livestock feed, that causes spontaneous abortions and infertility. Needless to say, his warnings were ignored. Why would the USDA completely ignore warnings from a scientist with 50 years of experience with plant pathology, soil-borne diseases, microbial ecology and host-parasite relationships?

“the USDA scientists, who have a tremendous amount of knowledge on the impact of glyphosate, have all been muzzled. They’re not permitted to say anything about it.” — Dr. Huber

GMOs are Not a Solution to Feed the World

There’s is no doubt that GMO’s are NOT a solution to feed the world. On the contrary, GMO’s are an attack on life itself, impairing a crop’s natural immune response — all while actually reducing crop yields. Despite everything Monsanto & Friends like to claim, there’s never been a GMO crop that increases the yield of any crops at all. Farmers actually can improve crop yields significantly using a variety of traditional breeding programs that promote improved gene expression.

We can increase all of the nutrient density with traditional breeding. In fact, the Brazilians are doing that. They’ve just released new varieties of soybean with higher vitamin A, and corn with higher vitamin A and vitamin C. We can do all of that with traditional breeding. We’ve been doing it for years. You don’t need to disrupt the genetic integrity and introduce all the collateral damage with its long-term effects.” — Dr. Huber

According to John Kempf, a leader in the field of high-performance agriculture, farmers harvest only about 10-15% of the genetic capacity of any crop. The true foundation of health, whether it’s plants, soils, animals,or people boils down to adequate mineral nutrition and a strong soil biology.

GMO’s Turn Your Food into a Poison

What the Monsanto & Friends in the biotech industry have actually accomplished is to turn your food into a toxic poison — making this an attack on life itself. In fact, it’s not really food at all. It’s not nourishing to living animals or people. It causes disease rather than nurtures healthy lives. It’s actually more like something cooked, microwaved, mixed with plastics then molded into something that resembles actual food. Biochemically, however, it is not really what most people think of when we go to the market at all.

Glyphosate alone, regardless of other GMO toxins, has several nasty biological effects. In fact, it may be the single most important factor contributing of a wide range of today’s “diseases of civilization.” These toxic effects include:

Glyphosate immobilizes certain nutrients and alters the nutritional composition of the treated crop. Disruption of the synthesis of essential amino acids not produced in your body so supplied through your diet
Increased toxic exposure to high levels of glyphosate and formaldehyde in the GMO food. Impairment of sulfate transport and sulfur metabolism, sulfate deficiency.
Systemic toxicity, a side effect of the disruption of microbial function in your body allowing for overgrowth of pathogens. Gut dysbiosis — imbalances in gut bacteria, inflammation, leaky gut, food allergies, gluten intolerance, etc.
Increased damage by other food-borne chemicals and environmental toxins resulting from glyphosate shutting down the function of detoxifying enzymes. Creation of ammonia (created when microbes break down glyphosate) which leads to brain inflammation associated with autism and Alzheimer’s disease.

How to Protect Yourself from GMO’s

Glyphosate sprayed on conventional GMO crops actually becomes systemic throughout the plant and cannot be washed off. GMO corn, for example, has 13 ppm of glyphosate — compared to NONE in non-GMO corn. That’s 18 times more glyphosate than safe levels set by the EPA. The only way that you currently can safely avoid GMO’s is to make whole, fresh organic foods the majority of your diet — preferably raw foods!

Don’t confuse the “natural” label with “organic.” There is no clear legal definition of the word “natural.” Corporations use that word to sell you anything at all. To label something as “organic,” producers must prove that they’ve grown and processed their crops using well-established organic farming methods that recycle, promote biodiversity, don’t use pesticides, don’t use GMO’s, and never use fertilizers based on petroleum products or sewage.

The majority of Roundup dumped on American crops is on your food! The thing to understand about GMO’s, in addition to everything else, is that they require heavy doses of glyphosate. Monsanto & Friends make a killing (literally) on this because they produce both GMO seeds and the chemicals they require. But it turns out that Roundup is a systemic chemical that is actually absorbed inside the crops. And, as it turns out, glyphosate doesn’t break down in the environment as originally promised. It is abosorbed and stores in your body, as well! But the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency still allows farmers to soak their corn crops with 50-times more glyphosate today than they did in 1996!

Glyphosate isn’t just an herbicide, as if that’s not bad enough! Glyphosate is also a registered antimicrobial agent that can kill a wide variety of organisms only harmful pathogens like Clostridium botulinum, Salmonella, and E. coli are able to survive glyphosate. But the good  bacteria that you actually need in your digestive tract (bacillus and lactobacillus, for example) are all killed, setting your digestive tract up for all kinds of health problems, such as leaky gut. When you gut lining gets compromised it lets bacteria and toxins into your bloodstream creating numerous problems.

Roundup Doesn’t Even Work!

Here’s what SHOULD BE the last straw — GMO crops designed to survive herbicides that would otherwise kill them are a doomed technology. Monsanto & Friends seriously overuses these chemicals creating a whole new list of problems including antibiotic-resistant super germs and super weeds that are almost impossible to kill.

dreamstime_xs_62773835When GMO’s were first introduced they falsely promised a way to reduce the use of chemicals — but they actually increased chemical use by more than by 500 million pounds! Despite this truth, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering approval of GMO crops designed specifically to survive even bigger doses of glyphosate, as well as the highly toxic 2,4-D weed killer. This will probably quadruple pesticide use in the near future. Remember, 2,4-D has been linked to hypothyroidism, suppressed immune function, Parkinson’s disease and cancer, among several other health problems.

So when it comes to GMO’s in your food … just say NO!


Renowned natural physician Dr. Joseph Mercola interviews Dr. Don M. Huber, one of the top scientists in the U.S on genetically modified organisms (GMO’s) and Roundup (2 parts). Dr. Huber is probably the leading expert on GMO’s in the world and is an award-winning, internationally recognized scientist, as well as a professor of plant pathology at Purdue University for the over 35 years. His agriculture research over the several decades has guided him to become a very active advocate against GMO crops.

References